第614页 / 共1391页

Like Socrates again, speaking in the person of Scipio, he is

afraid lest he should assume too much the character of a teacher,

rather than of an equal who is discussing among friends the two

sides of a question. He would confine the terms King or State to

the rule of reason and justice, and he will not concede that

title either to a democracy or to a monarchy. But under the rule

of reason and justice he is willing to include the natural

superior ruling over the natural inferior, which he compares to

the soul ruling over the body. He prefers a mixture of forms of

government to any single one. The two portraits of the just and

the unjust, which occur in the second book of the Republic, are

transferred to the state-Philus, one of the interlocutors,

maintaining against his will the necessity of injustice as a

principle of government, while the other, Laelius, supports the

opposite thesis. His views of language and number are derived

from Plato; like him he denounces the drama.