Книга · Nicomachean Ethics
Страница 589 из 734
Автор: Aristotle
Время0:00
Скорость (WPM)0.0
Точность100.0%
Нажмите старт и печатайте строки точно. · Backspace отключен — продолжайте даже после ошибки.
However, this argument at least seems to prove only that it
belongs to the class of goods, and not that it does so more than
anything else: for every good is more choicewortby in combination
with some other than when taken quite alone. In fact, it is by
just such an argument that Plato proves that Pleasure is not the
Chief Good:[3] "For," says he, "the life of Pleasure is more
choice-worthy in combination with Practical Wisdom than apart
from it; but, if the compound better then simple Pleasure cannot
be the Chief Good; because the very Chief Good cannot by any
addition become choice-worthy than it is already:" and it is
obvious that nothing else can be the Chief Good, which by
combination with any of the things in themselves good comes to be
more choice-worthy.
What is there then of such a nature? (meaning, of course, whereof
we can partake; because that which we are in search of must be
such).
Нажмите старт и печатайте строки точно.
Не начат